Why INTC Stock Could Surge to Over $200 Billion If Intel Breaks Up

Leading company in tech for long, Intel (INTC Stock) has hit some low peaks these last recent years. While trying to recover, speculation is rife on the possible strategic moves that may aid in unlocking some value for the shareholders. A rather popular idea doing the rounds regarding Intel is a potential breakup.

Features of Potential Deals with Rivals in Chip Manufacturing

In regard to Broadcom, the Wall Street Journal indicates interest in Intel’s highly lucrative chip design and marketing business, said to be considering Taiwan Semiconductor’s takeover of some or all of Intel’s manufacturing plants. Any such moves set forth could bring about radical internal change within Intel, which analysts say could deliver great value to shareholders.

So far, Intel has remained mum on the talks, with experts weighing their opinions. Evercore analyst Mark Lipacis went on to say a breakup would act to extract immense value for Intel shareholders. His assumptions placed Intel’s conservative estimate at $167 billion, or at $38.24 per share, on a scale that was considerably greater than the $23.60 at which Intel stock closed on Friday. From trading about $46 a share as recently as a year ago, Intel’s shares have lost 50% over the past year and 65% over the past five years, cutting its capitalization to $102 billion.

Potentiality of Raised Valuation

Lipacis asserted, though, that if the breakup went ahead and carried optimal assumptions, then a revamped view of Intel might average $237 billion or $54.18 per share in terms of valuation. Such valuation could translate into a chance for shareholders, particularly as Intel recently cuts through its devaluation process. Still, Lipacis observes that such a deal would face hurdles. Though he puts the chances of a breakup at not-so-limited,

Stickiness of Regulatory Environment

One of the major roadblocks in the case of any breakup will be getting a clearance from the regulatory framework in various jurisdictions, including potentially China. Most of Intel’s factories are built for the manufacture of x86 CPUs, and whether or not the transition to chips for kaivalya in other companies can be done at all for these factories remains to be seen. To add on, the foundry business of Intel has suffered considerable losses; according to reports, it has 76% operating losses against a backdrop of Taiwan Semiconductor maintaining upwards of 45% operating margins.

On the other side, concerns about antitrust actions and regulatory scrutiny are other aspects that some Wall Street analysts from Raymond James, Bank of America, and Bernstein have pointed out. Bank of America’s Vivek Arya pointed out that splitting Intel into regards would be very time-consuming and complex. More so, any discussion with Taiwan Semiconductor on Intel’s manufacturing operations will be restricted under the CHIPS Act funding, which requires Intel to keep over 50% control of its foundry.

Geopolitical Matters for INTC Stock

Similarly, a further complexity is added by the U.S. government interest in keeping Intel under domestic control. The Trump government was careful about foreign firms taking over U.S. firms closely working with the Department of Defense, Arya noted at the Bank of America. Proposals for foreign investment or control over Intel could trigger national security considerations because of Intel’s strong involvement in U.S. defense. Analyst Srini Pajjuri from Raymond James noted that expanding its U.S. manufacturing footprint in association with Taiwan Semiconductor could be a more favorable scenario.

A Possible Acquirer: Broadcom?

Notwithstanding, Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon considers that Broadcom would be perfectly suited to acquire Intel’s product business. Tan’s expertise in cutting costs while fostering innovation is anticipated to be good for Intel’s business going forward.

Intel Leadership Transition

An unforgiving twist to the fate of Intel has come with the leadership revolving door. The top executive responsible for the very aggressive turnaround efforts, CEO Pat Gelsinger, stepped down December 1. Under Gelsinger, big job cuts and cost-cutting efforts were engaged, along with ambitious plans to take on Nvidia and AI chips. With interim management by David Zinsner, [CFO] and Michelle Johnston Holthaus, who was formerly head of client computing, this instant presents a critical juncture for Intel.

The new permanent CEO must restore credibility to investors, resolve missed financial targets, and put Intel’s financial house in order. The true new leader will also likely have to talk openly about the potential breakup of the company as a way to maximize shareholder value.

Financial Difficulties and Future Prospects

Intel’s financials show how much trouble it is in. Its sales fell 7% year over year in the fourth quarter to $14.3 billion, and net earnings fell to $3.4 billion down 76%. Intel expects it may be able to break even and return to profit this year, indicating it may take some time to recover.

The future conversation on Intel will continue, and this is important given its weight in U.S. technology. In a recent interview, Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates spoke about the critical role for the U.S. to develop a credible alternate for chip manufacturing to Taiwan Semiconductor and Samsung. To achieve that is, according to Gates, a long road and would require big bucks; that is not going to be easy.

Conclusion

Intel’s future is uncertain, but its negotiations with Taiwan Semiconductor and Broadcom might bring some changes. Whether the company goes for a breakup or determines another form of restructuring, the results will be far-reaching for not only Intel but also for the semiconductor industry and the U.S. tech sector as a whole. Whatever happens, it will mark an important event for Intel and Intel’s shareholders.

Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are for informational purposes only. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or investment advice. Readers are encouraged to conduct their own research and consult with a professional before making any financial or legal decisions.

Follow our youtube channel, click here